Thursday, April 15, 2010

Clear Free Fluid In The Pouch Of Douglas

"left music" for liberals? - Dispelling prejudices

"One says this and the other says this

all have two legal, it depends how it's seen."

- I-Fire (dt reggae band from Hamburg) in "Two things .

It's true: The music that I listen to like, has left or even left-wing texts A few days ago I was asked how the for fits with my own political views, the answer is.. Very .. well, for being liberal is to remain skeptical and non-dogmatic skepticism

The philosophy of the British philosopher Isaiah Berlin (1909-1997) is for me the essence of what I have to say about the basis of my political beliefs: the "real, existing pluralism, the diversity among people, makes it necessary for us to find a form of government in which the various opinions on best to enter into an exchange, that is, a society in which there is ultimate freedom. Therefore, liberalism is the political direction which is most of the diversity of the human face.

Based on this understanding of politics, you can now take a look at the political music in Germany: It is not difficult to see parallels between the major thrust of the left protest music and the ideals of liberalism. Critique of the state and the civil rights issues and pacifism are often the center of the texts. One can eg Mono & Nikitaman with "Out of control "Benjie with" Sergeant "or, if you go more in the electronic direction to Egotronic with" The party is always right "or Plemo and Rampue with" fancy uncontrolled " think. These are just a few examples of how are liberal and left-wing positions in song lyrics very similar.

And even when left text and liberalism are simply not compatible with each other (I am thinking of Raggabund , Mellow Mark and many others) - it is also a sign of a liberal attitude, see themselves as critical to be able to put themselves in the position of others and to listen to criticism without reservation: Especially if it sounds good.

Sunday, March 28, 2010

Bunionette And Rheumatoid Arthritis

Hartz-IV-debate rule set unify, not child benefit for credit

Freital in February / March 2010 The Chairman of the FDP local branch region Freital, Oliver May talks within the framework of the so-called Hartz-IV-debate and in light of the Federal Constitutional Court ruling, which calls for a revision of the Bessungsgrundlage, each for a unification of the standard rate to 250 € month for every person, regardless of age, in need of a Community. However, it should not be counted against the child benefit, so that there would be 435 euros per child. This leads to an administratively simpler and cheaper for the state so, but also more equitable provision of ALG II and would be a clear and important signal for a child-friendly Germany. A family of four would have € 1370 for free, while rent, health insurance and pensions are paid directly by the consortium. This is such a family of loosely, it would be cheaper for the State and the Constitutional Court ruling is sufficient enough. For it is a truism - and to that extent is our national chairman Guido Westerwelle concur fully - the need to have those who work, ultimately more income than those who take government transfers to complete (pay indemnity rule), especially not the latter could be invested where the former this is not achieved. OM

Thursday, March 4, 2010

Motocross Cake Template

above the clouds must be free to cross the line well

"German criminal law applies, regardless of the law of the place, for acts committed on a ship or an aircraft which is entitled to the federal flag or bear the nationality mark of the Federal Republic of Germany to lead. "
- § 4, Penal Code

German planes are flying a piece of Germany. A murder on a Lufthansa flight will be prosecuted under German criminal law. While I would be convicted for a crime under U.S. law on a Delta flight, for example, an Air France flight can look quite different legal matter. How far can aircraft be islands of law - or the oppression? This is exactly me that is happening. Booked

the transatlantic flight with KLM from Amsterdam was departing from the land of freedom to the land of the free. KLM now informed me a few Weeks before the flight that had been rescheduled on Delta, which is a partner of KLM. What this meant for my rights? How did KLM, if I had booked the flight with Delta, given the fact that I now was subject to American law? So I had already been refused on Dutch air space a can of beer. Through the window you could take the view of sea of clouds and blue sky - the feeling of boundless freedom! The aircraft itself will be stripped of his civil rights because it is not by chance 21 (an American policy of more or less arbitrarily fixed age).

When the mental game a little more gear: you'd get for possession of small amounts of cannabis, which you take while flying in food to be on a Delta flight from Amsterdam to the U.S. trouble with Delta, although the drug so do not even introduce into the country is? Do homosexuals get on a flight with Qatar Airways fear? Can I do if I think the whole plane over German airspace a lecture on the genocide of the Armenians with Turkish Airlines for "insulting Turkishness" in conflict?

In presenting this lack of freedom where it really freedom "without borders" (ie not the same "unlimited") should be raised - for me at least - the hair on the neck ...