Thursday, October 1, 2009

Sister Seduction Blog

electoral successes of the Left - We say thank you!

On The Left Party in the election 27.9. can clearly rise. It is reinforced with 11.9 per cent of second votes and 76 deputies in the next legislative period. Special attention deserves the fact that THE LEFT 16 (!) Direct accounts, has won 12 of them outside of Berlin. Unfortunately, The Left, the huge losses of the SPD does not compensate, so black and yellow is possible. The Left will now form the driving force in opposition to the impending welfare cuts.

The parliamentary elections brought great success. The Left takes the first time in the Schleswig-Holstein Landtag. It was in Brandenburg 27.2% second-largest party, far ahead of the Union (19.8).

We thank all the voters, supporters and readers of our blog for this result. The Left will not disappoint the trust.

Monday, September 21, 2009

Bollywood Actresses Without Clothes Boob

special election for the parliamentary elections in 2009 with

Fast facts: 10 reasons to choose THE LEFT

first Financial crisis
The neoliberal policies in recent years has deregulated the markets and distributes income and wealth more unequal. It has thus the causes of the financial and economic crisis set. The result of this policy: We must all now a rescue package of 500 billion € for the banks to fund, while living in Germany 2.3 million children in poverty. Despite all the forward-looking action: Let us not forget who is responsible for them. Only the Left has been fighting for a credible regulation of financial markets and transparent rules and a just distribution of wealth.

second Who pays the bill?
will be to answer the question in the next Parliament, who must bear the consequences of this crisis. The other parties want to increase taxes and reduce the welfare state further - again to the average and low-income earners, pensioners and the unemployed pay the price. The Left says that the Profiteers of the crisis will be asked to pay. The Left therefore calls a property tax, a reform of inheritance tax and stamp duty. We want to relieve middle and low income, do away with the cold progression and strengthen domestic demand. In addition, the top tax rate be increased.

third SPD and Greens - left rival?
enter the election campaign is also SPD and the Greens again especially on the left. We measure it in their vote in the Bundestag. SPD and Greens have started the war in Afghanistan, not just always voted for a mandate extension. You have the Agenda 2010, Hartz IV and tax cuts for better- and take responsibility for best-paid and allowed the hedge fund. The SPD claims to demand the minimum wage, but in the Bundestag voted recently against the introduction of a minimum wage. She has placarded against the tax increase, and finally increased by as much as 3%. Who flashing left and right turns, is not selectable! For 7 more reasons, click on Read more:

4th Lobbying

In recent years millions of dollars from banks and insurance companies on the other parties paid for it (http://www.parteispenden.unklarheiten.de). This entanglement of politics with certain institutions is not without result: the destruction and privatization of social security like pensions and health care does not serve the interests of the citizens, but only the private providers in the market. The left calls to stop lobbying as much as possible and calls for a ban on large donations. This is an important step for the independence of politics.


5th Pension and health insurance
The other parties related to the privatization of the pension and the weakening of public solidarity systems. The left calls for a caring citizen insurance, and will first consider all income to finance them. End the division between private and statutory health insurance, her into a working retirement.

6th Domestic economy and the minimum wage
The first force called The Left Party in 2005, the introduction of a nationwide legal minimum wage, now have SPD and the Greens adopted this requirement, at least verbally. 21 of 26 EU Member States have a minimum wage in Germany, however, still circulating always fantasies of job loss and lack of recruitment. This after studies of other countries is a completely clear: A minimum wage destroys any jobs, but it reduces the profits of entrepreneurs. The Left say: low pay, as in the example below 4 € Thuringia, hairdressing, are not acceptable. The Left evaluates decent wages for employees is higher than even higher corporate profits. The wage spiral downwards can only be stopped through legal regulation. While the proposed by-right parties combined wage model of the state, thus the taxpayers, should pay the wage differences, called The Left, that benefiting from the work force firms pay wages - an ancient rule of the market economy.

7th Financing
against the claims of the Left is argued, they were not financially viable. According to calculations by economists brings a reaction the electoral program of the Left revenue of 160-190 billion €, the proposals also cost € 130-160 billion. The claims are secured financially. Cases, we were not on this maneuvering in! Let us look deep and open with different policy approaches and we have the courage to critically question: Who does the policy really? Whose interests are incorporated in the policy? I'm really informed versatile? On what information do I make my voting decision? Who actually determines how I claim that - valued - for example, the laws according to the minimum wage? Claims, not an equitable policy is affordable, are of interest arguments those forces that benefit from the current situation and prevent reforms do. Who elects the Left, is a sign that he can not be blind manipulation.

8th Afghanistan war
THE LEFT is the only force that does not believe that terrorism can be fought with war. In the Afghan war so far killed tens of thousands of innocent civilians, which brings about new hatred and new terrorist threat. The Left therefore calls for the immediate start of a coordinated military withdrawal from Afghanistan. War must be an instrument of policy, so get out of the cycle of violence.

9th Alternative left to make strong and Zeitgeist question
In the last legislative period, a variety of demands of the Left by the other parties were taken, including the system for the commuters, the idea of a statutory minimum wage or unemployment benefit I. By a vote for the Left do you change the policy so even if the links are not governed. The more the Left, the more economically effective and socially the country.

10th Real change in policy to advance
In the elections in the Saarland, Thuringia and Saxony, THE LEFT achieved great results and was more than the SPD in two countries. A vote for The Left are the others of the receipt for their unjust and economically inefficient policies. It is the right signal for a real, that is substantive policy change. Only a strong Left in the general election may prevent a social-liberal government of the cold.

why: On 27 September to vote for a just, caring and peaceful society. Both votes: THE LEFT. There

details about our high school group THE LINKE.BLS it under www.the-left-bls.blogspot.com . The election is the Left's program under http://die-linke.de/wahlen/positionen/ .

Sunday, August 2, 2009

Monster Logo Tongue Ring

baths. Business taxes - such as bathing

"understand what all the Socialists of money, is the fact that they want from others." - Konrad Adenauer

Wolfgang Heuer When asked how he would fund his many new investments for you, he answers with a sentence like: "For us, education is always in the streets before Premium -state. " is with the first glance into the SPD election manifesto to recognize, however, that it not be done by cuts in the infrastructure budget is: The SPD will improve the business tax, it can be no doubt. Even after all Muenster is one of the few cities in North Rhine-Westphalia, which have not yet slipped into the dreaded financial assurance. Yet.

loses in the financial security of many areas of his Council of crocheted Altun travel to the district government, then, from above, can impose austerity measures to cut back the debt of the municipality. Previously, Münster, keep up with sorrow and distress over water: The economic crisis has, however, the breaks in the budget made deep canyons. The business tax revenues were 290 million with Euro in 2008 yet to secure support of the budget - expected for 2009 treasurer Helga Bickeböller (CDU), only 245 million €, 2010, there are another ten million will be less. At the same time revenues fall by the municipality's share of the income tax by six million euros. The bottom line tears the hole of 70 million euros, missing the city of Munster in 2009/2010. For 2010, means the financial assurance.

Münstersche Both the local politics and the citizens themselves have not understood, are in the precarious situation, the municipal Finance! If the CDU candidate for mayor Markus Lewe then somewhere wants to raise a single cent in funding for a new building of the Südbad, the result in the local government only to loud laughter. Without close contact with his group, much less to take with the CDU-based Lewe announced on 1 July, a separate plan for a Südbad - the old one was from the Town Hall Coalition has been closed because of the budgetary situation: Since the big bang, the CDU plastered with the picture of a smiling, floating child and the inscription: "More opportunities for children" . This makes the city especially for surprise among those who witnessed the bathrooms closures in the neighborhood have, even for anger.

course it is understandable that parents want to see saved for their children close to home as opportunities for learning to swim. But it is dishonest, then do not want to see that the chances for these children not just then increase as they learn while swimming next door, but they must be the ones to the huge debts must wear once. In a town where at about 17 districts of seven swimming pools and four outdoor swimming pools (three outdoor pools just been renovated!) Does not exist the problem of lack of residence constructed nearby. With an expected deficit of 70 million says the top candidate of the Greens in Münster, Gerd Joksch, however succinctly, one should not ask how expensive would be a pool, you should ask how much the city was worth.

Such statements can only shake his head. On the question of reciprocal financing refer red-green and blunt the business tax, one of the few direct sources of revenue that can transform the community in general. The CDU has proactively decided not to rule out a business tax increase in its program - Lewe also know that it will go without a drastic cutbacks policy without them. But neither is talking about it at SPD, Greens and CDU nor the citizens - almost shocking to the voters to swallow a tax increase just like that. Only the FDP is clearly in for a business tax increase.

The business tax is one of the strangest inventions of the German state apparatus: it was introduced in 1936 and is calculated on the trading profits of a company, will be subtracted from the allowance of 24,500 euros. Then multiply the resulting taxable trading profits of 3.5%, the nationwide uniform tax rate (since 2008 consistently!). For a company with 100,000 € trade income is the a base value of 2642.50 €. Only now comes the municipality into play that determines the local so-called "assessment rate" with which the base value is multiplied. This is an average of 400% in Munster, it is 440%. The employer would have to cede in addition to this complicated process in an income of 100,000 € to all other taxes and social charges, € 11 627 to the city of Muenster.

is in the town of betting rings in the neighboring district of Steinfurt only 365% assessment rate. There, the contractor should submit only € 9645, representing savings of almost 2,000 € a year. In rural Bavarian municipalities as the local business tax burden on businesses, however regularly by 300% in Rettenbach on Auerberg (Ostallgäu) at only 230% - this would mean for the entrepreneur savings of more than 5,000 € a year, at least 5% of its total profits, would leave him in Bavaria in the bag!

questions must be allowed the light of these facts: What justifies the city of Munster, the fact that on the backs of young people who find no place more training, day care centers en masse to be built? What good is a city a flagship water park when the companies on the site the young job seekers have no perspective anymore? As Munster can still be attractive to investors when the economic crisis is further increasing the already too excessive exposure to the business tax? Why is instead set this tightening of the handicaps cathedral on the political agenda, with a threatening financial security even thought about additional public spending? - A response Heuer and Lewe owe. The other bill pay.